The
husband, Ian Miller -- whose name is mysteriously changed to Thomas in
the series -- has transformed into a whiny character (played by Steven
Eckholdt), rather than the charming Ian, protrayed by John Corbett in
the movie.
In the opening
scene, he argues with Nia's father about something petty, which is something
the character in the movie would never have done.
The official
word on the street is that Corbett turned down the series because he had
other projects going. I'm beginning to wonder if it was because he'd read
the script. After being involved in the movie, which was justifiably praised
for its script as well as for its acting, I can't imagine he'd want to
lower himself to standard sitcom fare.
The whole
first episode concentrates on the hesitation of Nia (name changed from
Toula in the movie, perhaps to give Vardalos greater name recognition)
and Thomas to accept a house as a wedding present from her father. Of
course, this gift took place at the end of the movie and was never an
issue, but was seen as a very generous, if eccentric, gift.
Now I'm
not saying that the series should never engage in any revisionism of the
movie's world, but it seems a danger sign when the revisionism starts
with the very first episode.
Nia's brother,
Nicky, played by Louis Mandylour, was a tough guy masking a sensitive
side in the movie, supportive of his sister, an artist who happened to
work in his father's Greek restaurant. The series turns him into a caricature,
a protective yet dimwitted older brother who, for no good reason, seems
to have it in for Thomas.
The father
certainly has developed a dislike for Thomas, probably because unlike
in the movie, he's now whiny and difficult. It looks as though the writers
have decided to use the old "opposites who dislike each other but
are stuck together" premise, which allows for the insult battles
so standard on today's sitcoms.
While veteran
sitcom actresses Andrea Martin and Laine Kazan, along with newcomer Vardalos,
get plenty of laughs, they can't rescue the show.
The problem
is, the writers are forgetting why viewers loved the movie. They loved
it because, while it was sometimes ridiculous, it stopped short of caricature.
The characters had their differences, but they didn't engage in verbal
insult battles. They actually cared about the things they were saying,
and about each other.
Because
of the writing, these actors, who were so complex and sympathetic in the
movie, become comedians, setting up punchline after punchline. The show
even ends with one of those frank talk sessions between Nia and her father,
where she insists on "no more interfering" and they conclude
with a hug.
None of
this would have happened in the movie. In the movie, the father was too
set in his ways to accept an outright demand like that. Nia and her mother
would have had to convince him by tricking him into thinking it was his
own idea. And the result, I believe, would have been funnier.
"My
Big Fat Greek Life" can't rely on standard sitcom punchlines and
caricatures if it wants to retain its viewership. It has to recapture
the qualities people loved in the movie. It has to step back from the
caricatures and get more real, walking the same delicate balance that
the movie did.
Moral:
Don't mess with something that works.
Copyright
2003 by Alyce Wilson
Musings
Index
|