Back
in the 1800's, can you imagine if they would have demanded an immediate
result? I'm sure that, via telegraphs, newspapers would get word about who
was the likely winner, but we've had a lot of close elections in our day,
and traditionally the way to resolve that is to count all the votes, not
simply to start pressuring one or the other candidate to concede.
I think
it's ridiculous to call this a democracy when we're not willing to count
every vote. If you count all the votes and Bush is still on top in Ohio,
fine. But a margin of less than 150,000 votes in a large state like Ohio
is reason enough to be careful before declaring a victor.
At least
I know that in Pennsylvania, Kerry won, probably boosted by a heavy margin
in the Philadelphia area. What happened to the rest of the country, I
ask myself? President Bush to date has apparently won the popular vote,
with something like 3.5 million votes more than Kerry.
A friend
of mine already has a theory about that. He says that the American elections
are no longer really about democracy or about issues but about money.
Whoever can raise the most money and smear the other candidate the most
ends up winning. The accusations don't even have to be true, just persistent.
Just think
about the pernicious lengths the Bush campaign went to in order to make
a Vietnam War hero with three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star and a Silver
Star look like a prancing showoff next to their candidate, who may or
may not have completed all of his National Guard duty in the safe zone
of the continental U.S.
Key members
of the Bush administration have been coming out of the woodwork for at
least a year, many of them writing books and talking openly about the
mistakes he's made in key areas of national security and foreign relations.
So how does
Bush counter this? He doesn't use any facts, just this general sense of
fear that he awakens in the American people, making them believe that
if you elect Kerry, there's going to be a terrorist attack. Ridiculous.
I mean,
if you believe Osama bin Laden's own videotaped statement just four days
before the election, America is more likely to be attacked if Bush is
reelected.
How can
a man who's been shown to be incompetent again and again, who gets before
the American people for a debate and can't even finish a sentence properly,
how can he get reelected unless people aren't basing their vote on something
they don't actually see in his performance?
They are
basing their vote, it would appear, on a nebulous thing called "moral
values." They've had preachers shouting at them in the pulpit that
they need to reelect Bush. Exit polls are showing that there were more
people concerned about "moral values" showing up than were concerned
about foreign relations, national security, the economy.
What twisted
form of Christianity believes that it's morally superior to make like
a cowboy and run rampant all over the world, leading to thousands of American
and allied deaths, than it is to protect American jobs, than it is to
make us stronger in our own backyards?
This must
be what Hunter S. Thompson felt like when Nixon was reelected.
I haven't
felt like this since George Sr. was elected. That was the first presidential
election where I could cast my vote. I remember walking across the Penn
State campus in a fury of tears, listening to They Might Be Giants, the
song "Everything Right is Wrong Again," wondering what the future
held.
I was up
late watching the results, and when NBC declared Ohio for President Bush
and started breaking down the numbers, showing that according to their
figures, it was impossible for Kerry to win, I did break out in tears.
I had to call The Gryphon and ask him to come over. I needed a hug.
It helped,
but the sour feeling in my stomach remains. And now it's worsened by the
news coming over CNN.com that Kerry called Bush to concede.
All I can
say is that if someone who wins by dredging up hate against gays, who
wins based on a policy of fear and a brutal political machine of misinformation,
thinks that he's God's candidate, I have a very appropriate Bible verse
for him to read in his inauguration speech.
"Jesus
wept."
|