Many years
ago, when I was a student at Penn State, I never had air conditioning.
Some of the classrooms were made tolerable by the AC, but others were
like sitting in a freezer. It was during those days I developed the habit
of bringing an extra shirt with me, just in case.
On the hottest
days, we'd hang out where there was AC, like catching a matinee or going
to the used book store or the coffee shop. So uncomfortable as it might
be during dog walks, I have to count my blessings.
As everyone in the free world knows, last night President Bush announced
his pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, John G. Roberts, who has been on
the D.C. Circuit Court for a few years now. When he was announced, I tried
to remember where I knew the name from, but I suppose I heard stories
about him when he was confirmed to the circuit court. It also turns out
he helped Bush make his case during the disputed 2000 election.
All I can
say is, it could have worse. The president was reportedly considering
people such as Judge Michael Luttig or Judge Edith Jones, each of whom
is far more considerable and would have raised more warning alarms from
Democrats and liberals alike.
Much has
already been made about something Roberts wrote in a brief while serving
as deputy counsel to the White House, where he wrote that Roe v. Wade
was decided badly and should be overturned. But he has since stated that
he should not be judged for things he argued on behalf of clients, in
this case the government of the United States.
At the time
of his circuit court confirmation, he said that there was nothing in his
beliefs that would prevent him following the rule of the land, in this
case the settled law of Roe v. Wade. Senators will no doubt question whether
that will change as a Supreme Court justice, where he will have the option
of reconsidering law.
By all accounts,
Roberts is a great legal mind. He's argued 39 cases before the Supreme
Court and is well respected by people on both sides of the aisle. While
he is conservative, let's face it: no one expected Bush to choose a liberal.
All we can ask is that he is knowledgeable about the law and is willing
to consider each case on its own merits without forcing rulings into his
personal ideology. That was, after all, what sunk Robert Bork.
Of course,
hearings will not begin until Congress returns from its August recess,
during which they will be conducting background research. So we don't
know exactly what will happen, but barring any big surprises, it looks
like Roberts will be sitting on the court when it convenes in October.
One person who benefits from the Supreme Court nomination stealing the
headlines is Scott McClellan, the hapless White House press secretary
who's been fending off questions about deputy chief of staff Karl Rove's
role in the leaking of a CIA operative's name. But don't worry; there's
plenty of time for that issue to resurface, after the independent counsel
makes its ruling. Who knows? Karl Rove may face the heat once more.
|